Talk:Engineering Society Branding Policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Engineering Society Branding Policy (edit)
Revision as of 20:40, 13 February 2012
, 13 February 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The real issue here is that skule.ca is down and they're using Skulepedia as a replacement. Perhaps they should work on skule.ca instead of the branding project? -Mauricio | The real issue here is that skule.ca is down and they're using Skulepedia as a replacement. Perhaps they should work on skule.ca instead of the branding project? -[[User:Mauricio]] 13 February 2012 | ||
I disagree: a page about the rebranding initiative should contain information relevant to the inception, process, and results of the project. As it stands, this page acts mainly as a usage guide for internal members (read: directors, etc.) of the Engineering Society. If you disagree, I only need to point you to the e-mail to directors which referenced the former page. The content of this page does not carry encyclopedic value, and any policy on use should be available under the Governance->Policies section of skule.ca, as well as having been included as a PDF instead of a reference to a wiki page that can be edited by anyone.--[[User:Hoalvin|Alvin Ho]] 23:28, 13 February 2012 (EST) | I disagree: a page about the rebranding initiative should contain information relevant to the inception, process, and results of the project. As it stands, this page acts mainly as a usage guide for internal members (read: directors, etc.) of the Engineering Society. If you disagree, I only need to point you to the e-mail to directors which referenced the former page. The content of this page does not carry encyclopedic value, and any policy on use should be available under the Governance->Policies section of skule.ca, as well as having been included as a PDF instead of a reference to a wiki page that can be edited by anyone.--[[User:Hoalvin|Alvin Ho]] 23:28, 13 February 2012 (EST) | ||
Going to talk to Officers about this; the content itself isn't the issue so much as formatting. It should be fine for EngSoc to post some form a branding policy that they agreed on (just as it would probably be appropriate to post a policy here as a page, in a form that is appropriate for public/students to view and use. -KPS | Going to talk to Officers about this; the content itself isn't the issue so much as formatting. It should be fine for EngSoc to post some form a branding policy that they agreed on (just as it would probably be appropriate to post a policy here as a page, in a form that is appropriate for public/students to view and use. -KPS | ||