Officers
103
edits
Talk:Engineering Society Branding Policy: Difference between revisions
Talk:Engineering Society Branding Policy (edit)
Revision as of 21:59, 13 February 2012
, 13 February 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'll reformat it to be more about the inception, process, and results. The encyclopedic value would be the thought process or the implementation strategy. What if in the future, we referenced it as "refer to section XYZ (link) for usage instructions," while the body of the content remained as Alvin suggested. | |||
Other note, if admin or anyone else takes down a page, can there be a generic message, like "this page has been blocked/taken down/etc. for [reason]." That way it doesn't just disappear but flags that it doesn't meet standards? | |||
The real issue here is that skule.ca is down and they're using Skulepedia as a replacement. Perhaps they should work on skule.ca instead of the branding project? -[[User:Mauricio]] 13 February 2012 | The real issue here is that skule.ca is down and they're using Skulepedia as a replacement. Perhaps they should work on skule.ca instead of the branding project? -[[User:Mauricio]] 13 February 2012 | ||