University of Toronto Engineering Kompetitions: Difference between revisions

From Skulepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "300px|thumb|right|UTEK Senior Design 2010 The University of Toronto Engineering Kompetitons (UTEK) will be in its 8th year in 2010, and acts as a ...")
 
Line 6: Line 6:


All six categories are held on the same day of competition, with an awards ceremony held at the end of the competition day.
All six categories are held on the same day of competition, with an awards ceremony held at the end of the competition day.
===Categories===
====Senior Design====
In teams of four, students in third or fourth year compete to solve an engineering problem disclosed on the day of the event despite limited materials and preparation time. This is a condensed version of the Ontario Engineering Competition (OEC) 15 hour competition, and will last 5 hours. The winning team should have a creative and feasible design, allowing them to move on to the OEC.
====Junior Design====
This category challenges first and second year students to design and construct a project which is revealed on the day of the competition. Similar to the Senior Team Design, both time and materials are limited. They are judged based on originality, creativity, teamwork and presentation. The time for this kompetition category is four hours.
====Innovative Design====
This category encourages aspiring engineers to experience bringing a new product or service to the market. Teams will produce an original design for a process, service or a product they have invented. Winning entries will have combined originality , technical and economical feasibility, a solid marketing plan with a high quality presentation and exhibition.
====Consulting Engineering====
In teams of up to four, kompetitors will construct and a promote a solution to an engineering problem which could be given on the date of the kompetition. In this category, sufficient preparation, teamwork, resourcefulness and communication skills are the key to taking home the winning prize.
====Engineering Communications====
The Engineering Communication category challenges competitors in teams of one or two to present a well supported viewpoint on the social, econimic and environmental impact of any current technological issue. In this kompetition, participants must identify a technological issue, form an opinion and present a convincing well-supported argument. Winning entries will have a through understanding of the issue at hand, a convincing viewpoint and a dynamic presentation.
====Parliamentary Debate====
In this category, teams of two debate in previously undisclosed resolution using the format of parliamentary style debate, With minimal preparation time, they must present a well-reasoned viewpoint on the topics given.


===Judging===
===Judging===

Revision as of 23:02, 17 January 2011

UTEK Senior Design 2010

The University of Toronto Engineering Kompetitons (UTEK) will be in its 8th year in 2010, and acts as a qualifier for the Ontario Engineering Competition. UTEK is hosted by the Engineering Society, although the Alumni Office offers large support for it, since UTEK is an event that not only showcases UofT’s engineering talent, it also engages past alumni to connect with students via judging

Competitions

UTEK Competitors can compete in one of six categories: Junior Design, Senior Design, Consulting Engineering, Innovative Design, Engineering Communications, and Parliamentary Debate.

All six categories are held on the same day of competition, with an awards ceremony held at the end of the competition day.

Categories

Senior Design

In teams of four, students in third or fourth year compete to solve an engineering problem disclosed on the day of the event despite limited materials and preparation time. This is a condensed version of the Ontario Engineering Competition (OEC) 15 hour competition, and will last 5 hours. The winning team should have a creative and feasible design, allowing them to move on to the OEC.

Junior Design

This category challenges first and second year students to design and construct a project which is revealed on the day of the competition. Similar to the Senior Team Design, both time and materials are limited. They are judged based on originality, creativity, teamwork and presentation. The time for this kompetition category is four hours.

Innovative Design

This category encourages aspiring engineers to experience bringing a new product or service to the market. Teams will produce an original design for a process, service or a product they have invented. Winning entries will have combined originality , technical and economical feasibility, a solid marketing plan with a high quality presentation and exhibition.

Consulting Engineering

In teams of up to four, kompetitors will construct and a promote a solution to an engineering problem which could be given on the date of the kompetition. In this category, sufficient preparation, teamwork, resourcefulness and communication skills are the key to taking home the winning prize.

Engineering Communications

The Engineering Communication category challenges competitors in teams of one or two to present a well supported viewpoint on the social, econimic and environmental impact of any current technological issue. In this kompetition, participants must identify a technological issue, form an opinion and present a convincing well-supported argument. Winning entries will have a through understanding of the issue at hand, a convincing viewpoint and a dynamic presentation.

Parliamentary Debate

In this category, teams of two debate in previously undisclosed resolution using the format of parliamentary style debate, With minimal preparation time, they must present a well-reasoned viewpoint on the topics given.

Judging

The UTEK Judging Panels usually consist of Alumni in the industry and Professors from various departments in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering.

Past UTEK Winners

Junior Design

Year Placement Team Member 1 Team Member 2 Team Member 3 Team Member 4
2011 First Hanna Janossy Daniel Jacobs Newton Jain Jad Knazyeh
2010 First Michael Del Balso Jay Zhou Zongyi Yang Colin Merkel

Senior Design

Year Placement Team Member 1 Team Member 2 Team Member 3 Team Member 4
2011 First Hubert Ka Ryan Bradley Philip Chen Jia Jun Qin
2010 First Kevin P. Siu Xavier Snelgrove Brendan Wong Charley Wang

Consulting Engineering

Year Placement Team Member 1 Team Member 2 Team Member 3 Team Member 4
2011 First Navdeep Swach Satyam Sahi Varun Chandan Satwick Sharma
2010 First Anna Sheu Liuba Mamonova Sapna Mehta Paul Klunko

Parliamentary Debate

Year Placement Team Member 1 Team Member 2
2011 First Yi-Wei Ang Albert Huynh
2010 First Raj Pattani Elika Mahdavi
2009 First Yi-Wei Ang Wayne Lin
2008 First Evan Jones Wayne Lin

Innovative Design

Year Placement Team Member 1 Team Member 2 Team Member 3 Team Member 4
2011 First Azhar Ali Ahmed Farroukh Waheed Ghouri Qazi Wajahat Sohail Waqass Bhattih
2010 First Jacky Lau Johnson Zhuang

Engineering Communication

Year Placement Name
2011 First Raphael Sammut
2010 First Manasvini Vaidyula
2009 First Raphael Sammut